Put review where the consequence is highest, not evenly everywhere.
Who decides, who reviews, and who is accountable?
Draft pathway. This content was written for the site and is awaiting content-owner review. The learning material in Learn with AI and Build Responsible AI has already been reviewed; this pathway has not.
Uniform review is expensive and tends to become a formality. Concentrate the scrutiny where an error would actually hurt — mandatory requirements, safety statements, anything a clinician will act on without checking.
- Tier review by consequence
A welcome paragraph and a mandatory-training statement do not need the same scrutiny.
- Verification beats approval
Checking a claim against its source is a different act from signing that it looks fine.
- Record the near misses
The errors your review catches are the most useful evidence you will get about the tool.
Daniel's team reviews every drafted summary. In practice, reviewers skim — the documents are long, mostly correct, and the review sits at the end of a shift. The statements most likely to be wrong are the ones most likely to be skimmed.
Daniel and every example here are prepared learning material, not a real case or an AI-generated result.
My governance outline
- Classify the content
Split drafted content into 'acted on directly' and 'contextual'. Requirements, deadlines and safety statements are the first kind.
- Verify the first tier against source
For anything acted on directly, require checking each claim against the named source document — not a general read-through.
- Make review survivable
Decide how long verification actually takes and where it fits in someone's day. If it does not fit, reduce the volume.
- Log what review catches
Record each caught error and its type. Review the pattern after a set period.
Review is passing everything.
Over six weeks, reviewers have approved every draft with no changes recorded.
What does this most likely indicate?
Every option has an explanation. Open as many as you like — nothing is recorded or scored.
Next: Guide people through the change
How do we bring people with us?