03 · Guide people through the change

Address the job question honestly before it is asked.

How do we bring people with us?

Draft pathway. This content was written for the site and is awaiting content-owner review. The learning material in Learn with AI and Build Responsible AI has already been reviewed; this pathway has not.

01 / Understand it

In healthcare settings, staff have usually seen efficiency initiatives before. Vague reassurance reads as evasion. Being specific about what changes — and admitting what is undecided — earns more trust than optimism.

  • Specific beats reassuring

    'Your role does not change' is only credible if you can say what does.

  • The people doing the work see the failures first

    Make it easy and consequence-free for them to report what the tool gets wrong.

  • Clinical judgment is not the target

    Be explicit that professional judgment is not what is being automated here.

02 / See it in context
Meet DanielStaff-orientation coordinator

Daniel announces the drafting pilot at a team meeting. Afterwards, two staff ask privately whether the orientation coordinator role is being phased out. Nobody asked during the meeting.

Daniel and every example here are prepared learning material, not a real case or an AI-generated result.

03 / Work through it

My change plan

  1. State what changes and what does not

    Describe the specific task affected and the tasks that are unchanged. Name what is genuinely undecided rather than smoothing over it.

    You produce
    A specific statement of scope.
    Worth reviewing with
    Someone who asked the job question.
  2. Create a private channel

    Give people a way to report problems and ask questions that is not a team meeting.

    You produce
    A named person and a route.
    Ask yourself
    Does using it cost the person anything?
  3. Protect professional judgment explicitly

    Write what the tool does not touch — clinical decisions, individual assessments, anything requiring professional judgment.

    You produce
    An explicit exclusion statement.
    Worth reviewing with
    A clinical lead.
  4. Set a real decision point

    Choose a date to decide continue, change, or stop, and say in advance what evidence decides it.

    You produce
    A date and stated criteria.
    Ask yourself
    Is stopping a genuine option on that date?
04 / Test your thinking
Explore a question · no score

The question came afterwards, privately.

Nobody raised the job question in the meeting. Two people raised it individually within the hour.

What should Daniel conclude?

Every option has an explanation. Open as many as you like — nothing is recorded or scored.

You have worked through Healthcare.

Join Build your leadership to work on this with the people and programs behind it.